Tag: RMIS Conversion

Mount Everest, RMIS Technology, and the Sunk Cost Trap

Standing atop Mount Everest is an extraordinarily rare feat. Since the first reported ascent in 1953, only 5,000 people have reached the mountain’s 29,029-foot peak. Over the same span of time, nearly 300 have died attempting to do so. And while making it to the top of Everest is tough, having the fortitude to turn back when the summit is within reach can be even more difficult.

The costs of climbing Everest are significant. In addition to spending roughly $100,000 for a single attempt, the time climbers put into planning and training for the venture is typically measured in years. Given these investments of time, energy, and money, many climbers not surprisingly push on in the face of extreme weather, oxygen depletion, and increasingly bleak odds. Unfortunately, the drive to make the investment “pay off” costs some their lives.

In a season 1 episode of the podcast Choiceology with Dan Heath, Michael Roberto of the Harvard Business School refers to this phenomenon as a sunk cost trap. In a sunk cost trap, Roberto explains that the human mind obscures rational thought because of emotional attachments already ‘sunk’ into achieving a goal. We all experience sunk cost traps in our daily lives: holding on too long to a bad investment, staying in a bad relationship, or refusing to walk out of a bad movie on your first night out in months.

read more

A Stranger is Calling — The impact of RMIS service team turnover

How many members of your current RMIS vendor’s service team have come and gone over the course of your relationship? What about the number of service team leads who have guided support efforts on behalf of you and the other users of your RMIS software?

When you dial into a meeting and get introduced to yet another service team replacement, your RMIS provider is under-delivering.

Many business-to-business software providers place far too much emphasis on “software” and not enough on “service.” In terms of features and functionalities, the results of such an approach may be impressive. But the imbalance comes with a cost. Subpar support is always detrimental to client success.

The importance of consistent, knowledgeable RMIS technology support is difficult to overstate. Given the increasingly complex risks every business faces and the ever-expanding role risk managers play within their organizations, a platform implemented five or more years ago may struggle to keep pace with an organization’s changing needs. A revolving door of service team personnel who need to be brought up to speed on the unique aspects of a RMIS and the risk management program it was put into place to support compounds the problem.

read more

In a RMIS, the details matter

When choosing a risk management information system (RMIS) or making a RMIS switch, the process of assessing systems sometimes feels like comparing apples to apples. As important as the big functionalities are, organizations would do well to look at the more granular details—details that, however simple they may seem, address their organization’s very specific needs, while also saving time and preventing mental fatigue.

As a Risk Management Monitor article says, “An effective relationship starts with knowing the specific requirements of your enterprise and setting relevant priorities” and then checking how closely your RMIS provider can match them.

Why the little things matter

The workforce today puts in longer hours, more days a week than ever before. But employees aren’t spending all of that time tackling more projects and setting more goals, as one might expect. The 2018 survey Companies Are Overlooking a Primary Area for Growth and Efficiency: Their Managers found that 36% of company managers spend 3 to 4 hours per day on administrative tasks. An employee who spends an hour manually entering data or emailing colleagues about upcoming tasks is using time that could be better spent on more valuable activities like interacting with clients and improving product offerings.

read more

Nothing Something will change when your RMIS provider is acquired

Is the sky falling? Or is it clearing? Will the new owners be a breath of fresh air? Or will they turn the business upside down? As a risk manager, you’ll likely hear all sorts of messages from peers, providers, and competitors. Following the acquisition of your risk management information system (RMIS) provider, the only message that matters is this: You have options.

It’s easy to feel as if your hands are tied as you seek answers to questions about what a new, combined company means for you and the users of your current RMIS. Asking questions and voicing any concerns regarding the answers you receive is the surest way to proceed prior to extending your contract.

Perhaps the biggest question—and in some cases, the one that is the most difficult to get an answer to—is whether or not you’ll be forced to migrate to the RMIS of the acquiring vendor.

While migration sometimes means you’ll be gaining access to functionality not available in your current system, the reality is that the move may not be as simple, or as straightforward, as promised.

read more

Why consistency matters: 4 key metrics that will lead you to the right RMIS partner

Selecting the right risk management information system (RMIS) is about more than choosing a set of features and capabilities. You’re also choosing a partner to help you meet your risk management objectives — both now and in the years to come. The aspirational nature of the sales process should only resonate if the team on the other side of the table can demonstrate a long-term record of success.

“That is why it is critical to vet out the potential partner as much as possible during the discovery period as the overarching goal is to produce a mutually beneficial relationship,” writes Michel Koopman in 10 Steps to Forming Long-Lasting Strategic Partnerships. read more

Timing is thingevery—How rushing leads to embarrassing errors

The pressure to do more with less is constant. But delaying an honest evaluation of your risk management information system (RMIS), while an understandable temptation, can lead to compressed timelines, rushed decisions, cost overruns, and additional grey hair.

Industry consolidation is forcing changes both good and bad. Regardless of whether you elect to stay with your current system or make a move, the worst-case scenario is to find yourself boxed in because you ran out of time.

There are a few critical factors a risk manager should take into account to ensure they are in the driver’s seat. Your time is limited, but your options don’t have to be.

read more

Elevate to better outcomes: How the happiest clients in the business are solving real-world problems with Origami Risk

A flexible, intuitive interface. Software expertise combined with insurance and risk experience. A collaborative approach to implementation that’s different by design. When selecting a Risk Management Information System (RMIS) that meets your needs, each of these elements is important, but in today’s market, these are baseline requirements. The critical factor influencing the choice of a system should be the answer to the following question: Will this technology drive meaningful business results?

Measurable outcomes are what really matter. The right RMIS must prove capable of contributing to your team’s ability to more efficiently analyze risk and insurance data, prevent losses, control claim costs, streamline renewals, and reduce your organization’s total cost of risk. If it cannot, what’s the point?

For some examples of the impact that partnering with Origami Risk has had on the business results of a few of our clients, please read on.

read more

Different by design—Key elements in converting to Origami Risk from a legacy RMIS system

Unforeseen delays. Cost overruns. Delivery of an end product that only slightly matched initial expectations.

Whether it was a home remodeling job or the deployment of new technology for a business, we all have stories to tell about the project we wish we’d never started in the first place. When purchasing or replacing a Risk Management Information System (RMIS), choosing Origami Risk means you won’t repeat the experience.

Origami Risk was founded a decade ago by industry veterans who recognized that improvements in the development, delivery, and support of RMIS technology were long overdue. A central component of the changes they introduced, and that we’ve continued to refine, is an approach to implementation and ongoing support that is different by design.

read more

RMIS switch ahead? 5 factors to avoid hidden costs and lost time

Perhaps outdated technology or the need for functionality that can handle changes to risk management practices means your existing RMIS has outlived its usefulness. Or, based on recent developments, you may be taking proactive steps in the face of the uncertainties that come with the acquisition of your RMIS vendor.

Regardless of why you’re looking to change systems, one thing is certain—you don’t want to have to go through the process again any time soon. When evaluating RMIS vendors, consider the following factors to reduce the likelihood that you’ll encounter the unexpected when it comes to getting a new RMIS up and running. This can help ensure that you avoid hidden costs months—or even years—down the road. read more

Two Key Considerations for Choosing a RMIS Partner

Choosing the right RMIS can seem like a balancing act. You’re looking for a solution that solves for the challenges the organization currently faces, while, at the same time, seeking a system and provider capable of evolving to meet needs that may arise.

Given the amount of work that goes into selecting a RMIS—not to mention the investment being made on behalf of the organization—the last thing you want to do is repeat the process in the near future. When interviewed for the CIO magazine article How to Choose the Right Software Vendor, Malcolm Cowley, CEO of the Performance Horizon Group, put it this way: “The last thing CIOs and other technology decision-makers want to be faced with is the need to re-evaluate and invest in a new solution two or three years down the road, when the existing system can’t handle the company’s emerging needs.” read more